<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleaning up your Ubuntu Installation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/</link>
	<description>The freshest &#38; hottest solutions, not just pointless and endless discussions. Finally a tech blog you can use!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micky Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-69140</link>
		<dc:creator>Micky Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-69140</guid>
		<description>apt-get autoremove only tracks packages you installed since the newest version of apt-get (the one that has that feature) but deborpahn looks for all orphaned programs. Also, deborphan will freqently remove things as &quot;uneccesary dependencies&quot; which are actually very necessary (this is especially a problem with audio and video libraries for mplayer and the like). Use both with some caution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apt-get autoremove only tracks packages you installed since the newest version of apt-get (the one that has that feature) but deborpahn looks for all orphaned programs. Also, deborphan will freqently remove things as &#8220;uneccesary dependencies&#8221; which are actually very necessary (this is especially a problem with audio and video libraries for mplayer and the like). Use both with some caution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Keswick</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-64904</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Keswick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 04:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-64904</guid>
		<description>I ran this today repeatedly like this site said to. I noticed some audio and video codecs on the list of packages to be removed, but I thought they may be old versions. It turned out to not be the case. This method removed important codecs. I could no longer view ID3 tag information in Rhythmbox without it crashing, and I could no longer use MusicBrainz Picard to tag mp3 files after running deborphan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran this today repeatedly like this site said to. I noticed some audio and video codecs on the list of packages to be removed, but I thought they may be old versions. It turned out to not be the case. This method removed important codecs. I could no longer view ID3 tag information in Rhythmbox without it crashing, and I could no longer use MusicBrainz Picard to tag mp3 files after running deborphan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-60370</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 22:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-60370</guid>
		<description>After today&#039;s updates I ran deborphan and saw some orphaned (unnecessary) packages. Executing &quot;apt-get autoremove&quot; did not clean out any of those! So I guess deborphan really digs deeper into the system. I never have had any bad experiences with removing packages that deborphan suggested, so it&#039;s safe to use IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After today&#8217;s updates I ran deborphan and saw some orphaned (unnecessary) packages. Executing &#8220;apt-get autoremove&#8221; did not clean out any of those! So I guess deborphan really digs deeper into the system. I never have had any bad experiences with removing packages that deborphan suggested, so it&#8217;s safe to use IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-58907</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-58907</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not quite sure about the differences between apt-get autoremove and deborphan, since I was unable to find any documentation comparing those two. In my experience though, deborphan show me orphaned packages even when apt-get autoremove did not show anything. So I personally, prefer to use deborphan. It has always served me well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure about the differences between apt-get autoremove and deborphan, since I was unable to find any documentation comparing those two. In my experience though, deborphan show me orphaned packages even when apt-get autoremove did not show anything. So I personally, prefer to use deborphan. It has always served me well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Stosberg</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-58690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Stosberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-58690</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the difference between this approach and &quot;apt-get autoremove&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference between this approach and &#8220;apt-get autoremove&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-58560</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-58560</guid>
		<description>Thanks, this seems to work nicely. However, the command &quot;sudo sh del_orph_pkgs.sh&quot; works. You left out the &quot;sh&quot;. Also, how is this different than running &quot;sudo apt-get autoremove&quot;? I&#039;m curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this seems to work nicely. However, the command &#8220;sudo sh del_orph_pkgs.sh&#8221; works. You left out the &#8220;sh&#8221;. Also, how is this different than running &#8220;sudo apt-get autoremove&#8221;? I&#8217;m curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonQ.net/flipp &#187; last 10 del.icio.us links</title>
		<link>http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/comment-page-1/#comment-58454</link>
		<dc:creator>bonQ.net/flipp &#187; last 10 del.icio.us links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yatblog.com/2007/04/22/cleaning-up-your-ubuntu-installation/#comment-58454</guid>
		<description>[...] Cleaning up your Ubuntu Installation &#124; Yet another Tech Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cleaning up your Ubuntu Installation | Yet another Tech Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
